xhq73t94fv79a

Our CMGI outlook is one we've held since 1995 but it's much stronger in 1999 as its success has rolled out.

In our view, no other one Internet stock offers an entire array of Internet growth as efficiently. Money managers looking to dress up their boring blue chip portfolios with Internet stocks who don't have CMGI in their portfolios should retire, in our opinion.

Through its majority-owned startup investments, operating units and minority equity in its venture side, we believe CMGI shares may be severely undervalued, that this firm may be a Yahoo-like entity in its pioneering approach, value creation and critical mass of capital. We also like the fact that Microsoft and Intel own just under 5 percent of CMGI. Risks? if the IPO market dries up then its investments may not find liquidity as quickly as possible. Or if the stock market tanks then the same also applies. But overall, short of having an ISDEX Mutual Fund (which we want to see), CMGI may represent a good proxy to the Internet in our opinion. Decide for yourself, see its Web site, ask your broker.

Our theory goes like this: Lycos represents a model for the integration of directories, e-mail, home page, community, chat and content to which the others here may follow or be swallowed by those that discover the equation that it's cheaper to buy users/traffic than build it.

We don't see large percentage growth occurring in the top 10 Web sites (Media Metrix rankings), of which both GeoCities and Lycos belong. We think the top 10 Websites in the world (namely AOL.com/Netscape, Excite, MSN, etc.,) may start buying traffic. These community sites rank in the top 25 in terms of users globally. So "community" looks attractive to us simply because it's been ignored in the recent Internet stock rally and traffic rules, real people matter. The risk is that each looks like it needs to add some missing pieces to make their site(s) fully-functional e-commerce machines and not hobbyists freebie hangouts. As the year goes on we think the winners and losers in this sector will begin to emerge--revenue growth is our top item we're watching here.

Broadband chips may matter as much as PC chips some day. Maybe not 1999 but 2000, 2001 and beyond. There's a ton of TV sets, two or three per household in the U.S. we believe, that may eventually have processors in them. They may not all be Broadcom chips--many will likely be Sony or Korean made--but Broadcom has the edge in our opinion with its cable and telco approach, playing both sides against the middle.

We also think Yahoo (NASDAQ:YHOO) is fast filling AOL's valuation shoes. In 1996 before Yahoo went public we said it was what AOL wanted to be on the Web. Our new mantra goes thusly: AOL is what Microsoft wants to be on the Web--everywhere in everything from dial up to shopping to community and content to critical mass (critical masses more like) of users.

We especially like AOL's leverage in the capital markets. AOL could acquire @Home (NASDAQ:ATHM) and end its battle to get cable carriage in one swoop. That removes what we see as AOL's biggest weakness: lack of broadband platform.

If it executes well, AOL could outpace Cisco on the valuation front. To us what's in the network is worth more than the network itself, a TV "show," for example, is valued higher than the TV "set." Cisco is the set or pipes, AOL is why people are "watching."

Together these stocks represent less than $2 billion market value, or 10 percent of Amazon. Yet combined ShopperConnection (from COOL to HLWD) sales rival Amazon. If I ran a roll-up fund I'd roll these four up into Amazon Junior in no time flat and add in CyberCash's (NASDAQ:CYCH) InstaBuy service that lets consumer input once and buy over and over. Risks? these are still separate entities and working together may prove challenging. Another way to do this, Wal Mart buys the bunch and integrates marketing and sales: instant e-tail powerhouse.

It'll cost Wal Mart more than that over the next 10 years to build and market its Web site successfully to beat out Amazon and others. With the buy, the Walton family would become Web e-tailers across a wide swath of a desirable demographic. Or Barnes & Noble (NYSE:BKS) follows its Ingram offer with this group and the e-tail space gets very heated. Bertelsmann is another contender here.

Hypermart, one of the top free websites for businesses, also holds considerable opportunities to exploit for Go2Net. Direct marketing to these businesses in office supplies and services such as outsourced e-mail are just two things we thought of that Hypermart can do easily. Go2Net just acquired Web21 also, which features the 100hot Website list. Latest quarter had positive earnings even. GNET's been on the rise since December -- it was actually the first stock we slated for the HotWatch '99 and even though it's risen we see a lot of potential under the hood here that could get discovered in 1999.

This is why AOL made such a stink about having the cable Internet backbone "open." Risk? It'll cost $30 billion to upgrade the U.S. cable infrastructure, built when Richard Nixon was in a different plumbing business, to make these pipes two-way. But AT&T (NYSE:T), which is acquiring cable heavyweight TCI, has already cut a deal with @Home for backbone. (TCI owns a stake in ATHM and was an original investor in it, along with venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins).

If successful, the cable industry could usurp the future of the Internet in many ways, rein it in under its coaxial control. Another reason why AOL should acquire @Home or go on a cable spree. On ATT-TCI, we think we'll see telco and cable mergers en masse very soon.

A forecast we did in 1994 predicted this but until bandwidth was "tolerable" to consumers to actually download--something it barely is today even--the ESD was more like LSD (likely science dreaming). Risks? if software developers sell direct. But we think coders may be more than happy to let Beyond.com handle selling. Added bonus, CEO was former VP marketing for Amazon (which could be a rival soon perhaps in software). But Beyond's focus appeals to us, along with its government contracts. And BYND revenue puts it ahead of Digital River.